Sunday, August 28, 2016

This is a message to the union members (CUEA) of our school district written by a passionate parent and student advocate Julie Collier.  She provides some clarification to the union about the upcoming election in CUSD that is based on their latest newsletter to their members (see newsletter excerpt at bottom of page). Since the local union is taking direct aim at those of us parents who have become outspoken about transparency issues and ensuring students are the priority in CUSD over the years, including Laura Ferguson for CUSD, this must be addressed.  Here is her letter posted on Facebook today:

Dear CUEA,

1. I am proud to stand with parents like Laura and others who have fought for children in CUSD at great risk to our own children. We have become accidental advocates for parents, students and the great teachers who work beyond the limitations of their union contract.

2. It was not the board who brought on the teachers' strike of 09-10, it was CUEA and the teachers who made the choice to vote for and walk the picket lines instead of being in the classroom with their students. This was done in the name of more money for teachers at the cost of increased class sizes, reduction in programs, and the loss of beloved newer teachers who were not tenured.

3. The "local politicians" are not back...we have never left. We continue to not only be outspoken, but question what is happening in CUSD with our tax dollars and the quality of education. We are not ashamed to stand up for improved education for ALL students in CUSD, including public school choice options that charters bring and true open enrollment within CUSD.

4. We do not, in any way, oppose public education, as you wrongfully state. We wholeheartedly support public education and expect the leaders and district admin to do all they can and uphold the value of high-quality public education for ALL students in CUSD, regardless of ability and socioeconomic status. Further, we believe if there is going to be a bond in CUSD, then it must be very transparent and clear to all taxpayers what will be done, how and when. Do you really think that is asking too much? Really? Yes. We supported Rebecca Friedrichs in her historic case against CTA because all she wanted was for teachers to have a choice in joining their union instead of being forced to pay dues. Clearly, the unions seem to support forced dues. Also, I'm sure you know I spoke on the steps of the Supreme Court in support of Rebecca. It was a very proud moment for me, which I will never forget. I can forward you the link to my speech, if you'd like.

5. We are election-weary too. We continue our fight against special interest groups that focus only teachers and maintaining business as usual education, like CUEA, H.O.P.E. and Children First. We run for office knowing we will never have the same funding as you, we will have to battle the ridiculous whisper campaigns wrongfully stating we will turn most schools into charters (so NOT true), teachers who stand by their union and call us evil to parents while passing out flyers in front of the school, people in PTA meetings "forgetting" to mention candidates who are not supported by CUEA, signs are not only stolen from public street corners but from front lawns, and some of our own children become the easiest mode of retaliation. Yet, we still speak up, we still run for office, and our children continue to bravely encourage us to do so because "their friends need help and a quality education."

And while I have your attention, CUEA, parents of CUSD would like the following:

1. Return our kids' tests back to our children so we can review it or have a tutor review it. We know there is no board policy on this, and teachers do not have a right to withhold this vital information in the name of recycled tests.

 2. Adjust your union contract to allow teachers to be available before and after school to help their students as needed. This will greatly benefit the working parents and truly is in the best interest of students, especially those in high school.

 3. Do not support the district policy that CUSD students can graduate with a D average. We can and should do better for our kids, with your help on this.

 4. Please support an open door policy for parents so they can meet with their teachers past school hours. This will help allow parents to truly partner with their child's teacher.

 5. Did I mention that parents would like their kids' chapter tests and quizzes back? Seriously. We want them back.

 6. Please allow tenured teachers to be evaluated more than every five years. I know the trustees you support past and present all voted for this ridiculous policy. There is no other profession that I know of that evaluates employees every five years.

I hope this has provided you some clarity on your stance against those of us parents or "local politicians" as you worded it. We will not stop or apologize for caring about the quality of education for students and the need for true transparency in CUSD.

Sincerely,

Julie Collier

PS. I know we all make spelling errors sometimes, but make sure you are spelling "public" correctly. I'm sure you didn't mean that Freudian slip in the third paragraph.
 
FROM CUEA NEWSLETTER DATED AUGUST 26, 2016
CUEA ENDORSES HANACEK, PRITCHARD AND HOLLOWAY
CUEA, by unanimous vote of Representative Council, has endorsed candidate, Patricia Holloway, for Trustee Area 3 in San Clemente. Patricia is a well-respected, long-term resident, city planner, community volunteer, who will represent ALL of San Clemente. The former PTA President of Las Palmas Elementary, she is pro-public education and the proud parent of a graduate of Las Palmas Dual Immersion, BAMS and SCHS. She has been recently honored by the San Clemente City Council for her community service and also received a commendation by State Senator Pat Bates.
 Last spring, the Rep Council endorsed both Board President, Amy Hanacek (Area 1), and Trustee, Gary Pritchard (Area 5), who have brought stability to the School Board, and have demonstrated a willingness to make decisions based on convictions and what is best for all students in CUSD, rather than being swayed by political expedience. Check out and “like” the Capistrano Unified Education Association Facebook page or our website at www.cuea.org for more information.
 
WHAT’S AT STAKE IN THIS TRUSTEE ELECTION?
Most of us remember the School Board that brought us the days of the strike of 2009-10 and the recall! Names like Winston and Lopez-Maddox remind us of a board beholden to local politicians rather than concerned about the state of our schools and the education of our students. 
Well, those same local politicians are BACK and endorsing their slate of opposition candidates. They are united in their desire to shut down Measure M, which will bring the urgently-needed improvements and repairs to our aging facilities [more on this in the next issue - anyone having trouble with air conditioning?]. These are the same local politicians who want to bring more charter schools to CUSD and who supported Rebecca Friedrichs in her fight to bring down teachers’ unions. 
 If you are election-weary, we understand it! We have been fighting off the onslaught of opposition to public education for years. However, now is not the time for apathy!  The opposition is united and prepared for battle. When your Building Rep asks you to phone bank or walk precincts, say, “YES!” The pubic trusts their teachers. They need to hear from you! We have shown our strength when united in the last several elections. We need this win! Let’s do it together!
 

 

Wednesday, August 24, 2016


As a concerned parent and taxpayer, I have attended school board meetings regularly once and more often than not, twice a month for nearly three years. Over this duration I have addressed the board and held them to account numerous times on a range of issues concerning the over-taxation of Mello-Roos taxpayers, high school attendance at schools funded with Mello-Roos, misuse of special taxes on maintenance, lack of public outreach on issues of importance, overcrowded classrooms, mismanagement, wasteful spending on consultants and lawyers to protect the district and battle constituents, and most recently speaking out against CUSD billion dollar bailout of failed leadership, aka the mega bond on the November ballot.   

We have an excellent chance this election to turn around the dysfunction we see regularly at the school board meetings. With four (4) seats (of the 7) up for election, a student-centered, taxpayer-friendly majority board is very likely if you and your friends get out the vote in Trustee Area 3 (Ferguson), Area 2 (Reardon); Area 1 (Shrove); and, Area 5 (Vollebregt).

http://www.ocregister.com/articles/elementary-726275-school-area.html